Skip to Main Content
Need Support? Let’s guide you to the right answer or agent.
ADD A NEW IDEA

Applications

Showing 1258 of 1406

Request for Capability to Display/Not Display Specific Components of the Roadway Model in ConceptStation

In ConceptStation, the entire roadway model is in the same display category (Road) such that it is not currently possible to turn on/off specific components of the model – for example, cut/fill sideslopes. This product idea is requesting for diffe...
5 months ago in OpenRoads ConceptStation 0 Future consideration

Request to Modify Superelevation Rate for Roadways in ConceptStation

In ConceptStation, superelevation rates are automatically applied based on design speed of the roadway. However, this product idea is requesting an enhancement capability to apply a desired superelevation rate to the roadway independent of the rat...
5 months ago in OpenRoads ConceptStation 0 Future consideration

Apply superelevation to Linear Templates

I have built a civil cell using linear templates. The civil cell will need to have superelevation applied to it. Currently I cannot apply superelevation to the linear templates, and I cannot use a corridor within my civil cell without other issues...
7 months ago in OpenRoads Designer / Superelevation 0 Future consideration

Allow drainage nodes to show up as a cell (catch basin, headwall, end section) in profile view.

Drainage nodes show up in 2D as the cell/feature definition it is designated like an end section. It would be useful if that same feature would show up in the profile view for drainage profiles. It currently works for the "utilities" part of "Drai...
over 1 year ago in Drainage and Utilities / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer 4 Future consideration

Having an Undo & Redo button for the Table Editor

Sometimes mistakes happen. Rather than closing out of the window and waiting for ORD to undo the mistake, the "Undo/Redo" button would make the design process all little smoother. The button won't end mistakes but it sure beats having to close out...
11 months ago in Geometry / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer 0 Future consideration

Need the ability to automatically update the "true" Best Match survey setting in older versions to the proper option in later versions.

In 10.11 R1, the Best Match Field Code survey setting option changed from a True/False option only to a more extensive dropdown list. However, when older survey files are upgraded, there is no way to control which best match option is to be used. ...
almost 2 years ago in OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer / Survey 1 Future consideration

Ability to follow two surfaces with overlay component

It would be helpful to be able to follow two different surfaces in an overlay component, one for the top and one for the bottom
25 days ago in Modeling / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer 2 Already exists

Search bar for feature definitions

We would like to see a search bar or Filter for Feature Definitions. Our Featue Definitions are numbering in the hundreds if not thousands and as much as we try to organize it in a way that makes sense some are still hard to find.
over 1 year ago in OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer / User Interface 1 Future consideration

Create KMZ files that allow geometry annotation on export.

This would allow annotation on Geometry to export to KMZ files. Currently you have to drop status on all text annotation on geometry to be able to see it in a KMZ file.
about 1 year ago in Import/Export / OpenRail Designer / OpenRoads Designer / OpenSite Designer 0 Future consideration

Apply cut/fill annotation to surface templates

When creating a cut/fill End Area Volumes table on cross sections, the annotation does not work for surface templates. If there is no corridor in the cross section, it will not even place an EAV Table. The cut/fill EAV tool works and displays the ...
11 months ago in Annotation / OpenRoads Designer 0 Future consideration